Industry
Healthcare
Blueprint type
OpenCode
Use case
AI Agent

Demonstration content

This blueprint page exists to exercise the catalog, its filters and the page template. It does not describe a released blueprint, and the sections below are placeholders rather than real implementation guidance.

Overview

Summarize clinical documentation into structured fields with human review built into the workflow.

This page shows the structure a blueprint detail page uses. The problem statement and component list below are real design context; the deployment and usage sections are placeholders.

Problem addressed

Clinical documentation is long, repetitive and time-consuming to review, but summarizing it automatically raises immediate questions of accuracy, auditability and data handling that a naive integration does not address.

Architecture

Component overview
  [1] Structured output schema
  [2] Review interface
  [3] De-identification stage
  [4] Audit trail
  [5] Inference backend

A concrete architecture diagram will replace this sketch when the blueprint is published.

Key components

  • Structured output schema — Forces summaries into reviewable named fields.
  • Review interface — Presents each generated field beside its source passage.
  • De-identification stage — Removes identifiers before any content leaves the trust boundary.
  • Audit trail — Records every generation and every human decision.
  • Inference backend — An llm-inference deployment inside the compliance boundary.

Prerequisites

  • An inference endpoint. On MareNostrum 5, start one with llm-inference api start — see the quickstart.
  • The base URL of that endpoint, http://<host>:<port>, as printed by api start.
  • A model ID listed by llm-inference model list with SUPPORTED=yes.

Deployment instructions

Configuration

The configuration surface will be documented here. It is expected to cover at least:

Setting Purpose
<ENDPOINT_BASE_URL> Base URL of the inference endpoint, e.g. http://nid001:45123.
<MODEL_ID> Identifier of the model to call.

Usage

Draft

Worked usage examples will be added with the published blueprint.

Security considerations

These apply to this blueprint’s design and are not placeholders — they hold regardless of implementation:

  • Model output is untrusted input. Validate every tool call independently before acting on it. See Function calling.
  • The inference endpoint has no authentication. api start exposes a plain HTTP port inside the MN5 network; anything reachable from there can use your allocation.
  • Enforce authorization in your own code, on the end user’s identity — not on what the model requests.
  • Treat prompt content as data subject to your retention and access rules; it is written to the shared filesystem.

The full guidance is in Security notes.

Observability

Per-request latency and success or failure are recorded for every request; where those land and how to inspect them is described in Logs and monitoring. Application-level outcome metrics specific to this blueprint will be listed here on publication.

Limitations

Next steps